Thursday, June 11, 2009

Something To Think About

Last week I was having a chat with my friend about “what is life?” We came to the conclusion that anything that has life is some thing that can respond to a particular environment in a particular manner. Then the question raised that, then what is a non living thing? Anything that cannot convert energy of one form to other form and without any external force or medium is a non living substance. And it also responds to each environment in the same manner. Example a chair.
After a prolonged conversation we came across a fact that a human brain cannot imagine a color other than the present ones. But it is also a fact that Albert Einstein used only 5% of his brain with the help of which he was able to come up with the theory of relativity. We concluded that if a man uses 100% of his brain he can create universes.
So start training your brain.
Anybody who finds any mistake in this Article please post your comments it will be helpful for me.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

I completely agree with the fact that if a man is able to utilize 100% of his brain he can accomplish even the hardest task. But just training is not enough. Knowledge and experience coupled with training can help us to use our brain better because a man always learns from his past mistakes or from the mistakes of some other person. So I suggest that the words 'knowledge' and 'experience' should be included with 'training' in the given message.

Unknown said...

Why longing after the methods which are prone to misuse. Revisit the old Vedic system of Self Realisation which shows the way. Read Patanjal Yoga Shastra, learn out the system of self realisation. You will find that after the aspirant rises above 4th stage he imbibes power beyond anybody's imagination and reaching the 6th stage empowers him to creat another Universe! Remember Viraat Roopa of Krishna!

Arun Roy Mukherjee said...

Mr. NAC started his comments with a pronouncement that a good surgeon needs the blessings of both Mars and Saturn. But he has not forwarded any proof in support. If his contention is true then it must be accepted that Planets Mars and Saturn have the knowledge, skill and qualities to make a good surgeon and have also the quality to transmit such knowledge, skill etc. to a person on earth. But where on those planets are such qualities hidden and how those planets transmit those knowledge and skill to a person on earth ? Could Mr. NAC enlighten us on the matter ? Should we also have to accept that those planets have minds, brains, intellect and skill through which knowledge and skills are acquired and transmitted? Even to convet the blessings, it must have to have a mind. Do we have to accept that these stars and planets are all animate objects? Mr. NAC, however has not given any explanation, logic, reason, or scientific proof in support of his claim.
Mr. NAC has also stated that some religious teachers did not believe in the Supreme Being and therefore their views should not be accepted as correct. His obvious reference is to Goutam Buddha. Many orthodox Hindus, without a proper understanding of Buddha’s teachings, branded him an atheist. Buddhadev was pained to the sufferings of human beings and his entire attention, effort and longing was to find a way out of such sufferings. He found that a man can overcome it if he can come out of the cycle of birth, death and rebirth and so on. He dedicated his entire life for the cause. Moreover, even if we, for argument’s sake, accept that Goutam Buddha was an atheist, can we deny his knowledge, his wisdom, love and compassion ? Can all the knowledge, intelligence and all other qualities of all the persons taken together who believe in astrology stand anywhere near in comparison to the great knowledge and wisdom of Goutam Buddha or any other so called atheist religious teachers taken individually?.
And then, may I very humbly ask why no questions were raised about other religious teachers and sadhus mentioned by me? What about my comments that the prupose and object of religion and astrology are contradictory?
I studied many cases myself and also saw many so-called experts judging horoscopes. I never found that all the predictions of a person or of different person come true. When the prediction fails, the excuse is that birth time must be wrong etc. There are no shortage of explanations. The gist is “Head I win, Tail you loose”. So, my personal experience is that it is an intelligent and good guessing game.

I myself, am a devout Hindu and that is why I have learnt to accept the Truth and go beyond all superstitions.